Author Topic: Is a kx500 the right bike for me. Opinions please. Woods ridding. Should I sell.  (Read 9280 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

chrisorbics

  • Guest
Hi I have a 1986 Kawasaki kx500 works replica that is mint and completely stock. It is all stock and has barely any time on it since new. I ride in the woods and as soon as I got the bike I wanted to get a lighting coil and put a kdx200 headlight on it. Then I wanted to get a steahly flywheel weight and a moose reed spacer.

Now I have taken the bike out twice and I have still not done anything to the bike. I am at the point where I can either modify the bike to make it better for what I want to do with it or I can sell it and get something that would be better for me.

The reason I am look for opinions I because I feel like I have something that is meant to go fast all of the time and where I ride it is just not possible to go fast all of the time and that I could have a different bike and go the same speed. I always felt like I should get a suzuki rmx 250, kawasaki kdx250, or a yamaha wr250r.

Am I waisting the speed and power potential if I do not have this bike all out blasting past everybody else all of the time? Should I modify this bike to make a little better torque for offroad ridding or should I sell it and get something that has a headlight, softer suspension, and is already set up for torque. Does anybody have or have ridden any of these 250 two stroke enduros. There is also the kdx200 but that seems a little small. I do not know what to do. Give me your opinion and suggestions.

Chris

Offline The Flyin Hawaiian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Ive raced/ridden all of the bikes mentioned. They all worked well when setup properly. I raced an 88 KX 500 in enduros in 88-89. The only mods that i did to it were a flywheel weight, 2 base gaskets and had the head modified for a little less compression. It was very smooth and rideable. Still a little too big for our type of terrain. (extremely tight woods, Southern New Jersey has some of the tightest woods in the US) I switched to a KDX 200, which I left mostly stock except for a pipe and silencer. This bike worked very well. It got me into the A class. The early 90s KDX 250 had a great motor but wierd handling. It had a big tank that wouldnt let you get up forward to aid in turning. They werent very popular out here. The RMXs were great bikes and worked well especially when uncorked. One of my favorite bikes was the 94-97 Yamaha WR 250 2t. This bike had all kinds of motor but it also had the big tank, wierd handling issue of the KDX 250. Since the WR was basically a YZ 250, this was easily taken care of with a new tank and YZ seat. The KDX chassis was not based on the KX of that time and there was no easy fix. I had a custom carbon fibre tank made for it, but it was pricey at $400. The WR was bullet proof also. Ive also owned a bunch of converted CRs, YZs, and am currently back on KXs. All 250s. Keep in mind that I primarily raced most of these bikes, but all should work well for the casual trail rider and occasional racer. Do you have any pics of the 500?
A couple of 03 and 04 KXs, a few YZs, 3 PE 400s, a DR and a TS.

Offline The Flyin Hawaiian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
The carbon fibre tank was for the WR not the KDX.
A couple of 03 and 04 KXs, a few YZs, 3 PE 400s, a DR and a TS.

Offline Mick

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 123
The flyin hawaiian has a good answer, but I've got to be the devil's advocate for a minute.
Apparently for the type of riding you do, and the skill that you're at.  Maybe any of those bikes would do you just fine...I don't know?
But if I was your riding buddy, I'd be at your knees begging you not to get any of them.  For the love of god!!
Let me just say size can be deceiving.  You think the 200's would be too small?  I'd beg to differ.  On a dino the 200 will crank out a sliver less hp then those 250's, but they weigh 20 lbs less if I remember right and handle soo much better.  Keep in mind I'm talking about late '90s 200's.  The perimeter frame KDX's.  I suppose as the hawaiian stated if those 250's are set up properly they might be ok.  But IMO the 200's come plenty equipped for play and race applications from the factory.  And you have more choices then just the KDX.  My Dad's Gas Gas 200 is one of the finest off road bikes I've ever ridden.  I've also very much enjoyed my friends KTM's as well.  You can lug them when traction is hard to find and scream them like a 125 when traction is good if you'd like.
I just have to say that if you feel you need to go fast, a bigger motor isn't going to help you.  The 200's are so well made anyone can get on them and haul ass through the sticks with the best of them.  The don't have any weird quirks or handling traights.  And it's not that difficult to build a 200 motor that will run with most "current" 250's.
My personnal bike is a '03 Service Honda (uh oh I said it).  And I was hands down faster in the woods years ago aboard my '93 200 than I am now on my Honda.
If you're a guy who really needs more oomph than the 200 has got, I'd strongly suggest getting any 250 MXer and doing your flywheel weight, hand guard and 18" wheel conversion.
I wouldn't take a truck load of those 90's 250 woods bikes if they were given to me!
1989 KX500
2003 Service Honda CR500AF

Offline The Flyin Hawaiian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
I agree, todays 200s run great. I tried out a KTM 200 not long ago and was surprised at how strong it felt! I myself still prefer the power of a 250. I can lug them down lower with out as much clutch abuse and be a little more lazy with them when I start to get tired. I also tried out a 06 KTM 300 last summer, which I liked alot. I just cant get myself on a KTM, I had a 250 EXC and had nothing but bad luck with it. Next years KTM 250 and 300EXCs are coming with E Start!
A couple of 03 and 04 KXs, a few YZs, 3 PE 400s, a DR and a TS.

chrisorbics

  • Guest
Hi thanks for all of the comments. I would love to get a ktm but I really do not have the money. They make some amazing machines. Gas gas also makes very high quality bikes but they also have a high price tag. I rode a 1991 kdx250 once years ago but it really was not running right so that does not help me. I have never ridden a kdx200 yet. Is there a big difference between the older and newer ones. I think they updated them in 1997. I would love to try a kdx200 or 220 out but I do not know anybody who has one. Keep the comments coming.

Chris

Offline quincyman

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 41
I rode a 1994 KX500 in the woods for many years. I don't race but ride for pleasure. You can ride them fast in the woods but the effort is greater than on a 200/250 size bike. They can be lugged around slow all day long and should you really need the power it is there. A flywheel weight and maybe some other personal preference mods and they will do whatever you ask of them.

Having said all that let me finish with this. My favorite woods bikes are my 525exc and KDX220. But there are still days when the KX500 is it.

Offline Polar-Bus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,023
Hi I have a 1986 Kawasaki kx500 works replica that is mint and completely stock. It is all stock and has barely any time on it since new. I ride in the woods and as soon as I got the bike I wanted to get a lighting coil and put a kdx200 headlight on it. Then I wanted to get a steahly flywheel weight and a moose reed spacer.

Now I have taken the bike out twice and I have still not done anything to the bike. I am at the point where I can either modify the bike to make it better for what I want to do with it or I can sell it and get something that would be better for me.

The reason I am look for opinions I because I feel like I have something that is meant to go fast all of the time and where I ride it is just not possible to go fast all of the time and that I could have a different bike and go the same speed. I always felt like I should get a suzuki rmx 250, kawasaki kdx250, or a yamaha wr250r.

Am I waisting the speed and power potential if I do not have this bike all out blasting past everybody else all of the time? Should I modify this bike to make a little better torque for offroad ridding or should I sell it and get something that has a headlight, softer suspension, and is already set up for torque. Does anybody have or have ridden any of these 250 two stroke enduros. There is also the kdx200 but that seems a little small. I do not know what to do. Give me your opinion and suggestions.

Chris

This all kinda hinges on the level of speed you are looking to achieve in the woods. You didn't really say if you intend to race, or just play woods ride. They are 2 different animals. If you intend to race, be prepared to have the task of a lot of mods like a flywheel weight, gearing change, and suspension revalving, and lighting upgrade. After all this you still have a heavy 240ish lb torque tractor of a bike. It will become a physically abusive bike over a long enduro. The KX500 was engineered as a high speed desert weapon, not really a woods bike. Just casual fun woods riding however is all together different, I would just add a flywheel weight, gear down like 14/50, soften up all the compression clickers, and go have fun. I have spent a lot of time in the woods with my 500 and on a fun level they are a blast in the woods once some mods are done ! Good luck
01' KX500
'84 GPz1100
'87 GSX-R  750
'06 HD Fatboy
'73 Kawi H1
'03 CRG KX500 Shifter kart

Offline hughes

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,923
    • Dirt Hammers
Good input some everybody. I don't race but I ride at race pace. I ride with boys that run yz250's, yz250f's, kx250's and I can run with these boy neck and neck in the tight woods on my 500 but it takes more effort on my part to keep up the speed. When the trail opens up watch out the 87 500 coming. I'm in the same spot as you. I'm looking to get a newer 250 2-stroke for woods riding (250 2-strokes are so easy to ride in the woods) but now my current bike is fun and paid for and adding little things to the bike to make it run better is cheap at this time until I can swing a new bike. Your bike will and can work great in the woods.
Open Class 2-Stroke Kawasaki KX500
Yamaha 2005 YZ250
Richard Hughes
Dirt Hammers - Online Off-Road Journal
hughes@dirthammers.com
http://www.dirthammers.com

Offline c-152

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
I am a little over a year into owning my kx500.  I used to ride an RMX250 and sold it for the 500.  I am not yet sure it was a good move.  The 250 was a good machine was not quite the handful the 500 is but I honestly do not notice much of a difference.  I have a flywheel on it as well and it runs like a tractor.  The only problem is I can seem to dial the carb in to get it to run correctly after it gets hot and that screwed me in me last harescramble.  (Well it wasnt like I was battling for position but it was still a bummer).  My take is this:
For me the 500 when riden correctly can hid a lot of poor riding habits and bad skill such as not using the clutch properly to maintain power.  To get something with the horsepower to lug up hills that do not have a lt of runout on the botom I would have to spend a lot of money that I do not have so the 500 was the cheapest option.  If I was a better rider, I would probably want a 200 as the are more suited for many of the trails I ride and the harescrambles around here.  I ride in southern Ohio.
I would still keep my 500 as hillclimbing on that thing is a blast.
?There are only three sports: mountain climbing, bull fighting, and motor racing. All the rest are merely games.?
? Ernest Hemingway

"I want to leave this world the same way I came into it: Screaming and covered in blood."

Offline BigGreenMachine

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 284
Well now your going about it right but there is an option that nobody has mentioned.

The limiting factor to the 500 in just about every situation is its old tech chassis.

How about putting that badboy of a motor in a newer KX250 chassis? The 99/02 are pretty easy swaps and those bikes can be had for cheap if you find a roller.

Then once you get the motor swap done throw on a flywheel weight and go shred the singletrack.

I don't know, maybe I'm wrong but that would be one nice trail machine IMO.

Offline Hillclimb#42

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 991
  • '97 kx 500, '96 kx 250, '99 KTM 380
 Thats also a sweet idea. That and the KTM's, but way too much loot. Back to "keep the 500 or sell it for a kdx!?" I almost bought a kdx before I bought my 250. Everyone is right that they are zippy, like a 250, ...almost. 250's are head and shoulders faster than a 200. And a 500 is that much faster than a 250.
 If it is dollar to dollar comparisons though, the k5 is cheapest to buy. As far as rideability, its always a money issue. Suspension, Steering stabilizer, new rubber, gearing and even stuff like bark-busters and reed spacers make it ride close to a 250. My 500 is real close to my 250, except that the k5's weight and the surge, make it harder to stop. Alot of guys recommend a flywheel weight to control the power some. I personally got rid of mine, because I believe that it adds to the surge that they have. For better roll-on power I recommend, shifting up one gear!!! :-P

chrisorbics

  • Guest
Hi thanks for all the comments. I really enjoy reading everybodies input.

I am just trail ridding and I have never raced. I am not into motocross or a lot of jumping. I really enjoy going on a nice long trail ride and seeing how fast I can go sometimes. There are other times where I will go out ridding with my buddy who only has an xr200 and I have to slow it way down. Even at slow speeds this bike really is not that bad to ride. I have owned a lot of 125 race bikes and they suck in the woods unless you are going all out and abusing the clutch.

As far as what c-152 had to say he is exactly right. These bikes are such a bargan. If you started puting money into another smaller bike you could not make it close to as fast without spending a lot of money. This bike is a torqe monster. I love not having to shift all of the time either. Every other motocross bike I have owned or ridden was just anoying to ride. You would have to shift constantly.

I am starting to think maybe I will save up some money and try and get an older kdx200. My problem is money. I got my bike for less than what it is worth because the front and back wheels were both cracked and the bike had been sitting for a long time.

BigGreenMachine has a great idea. This engine is great but the handling is not the best. The thing I can not get past is tearing apart an extremely low hour all original and stock bike. It is not everyday that you see a 1986 kx500 that is all original. I even have the original title. Still a good idea but I just cannot do it.

I like what you had to say Hillclimb#42. The engine surge is crazy on this bike. It really takes some getting used to. Why do 500 two strokes do that. It really is scary when trying to stop.

Keep the comments coming. I have two pictures I am going to try and put on here. I also have some links to some short videos. I will make more videos and take more pictures very soon.

<a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o94/chrisorbicsebay/kx_500_2.jpg" border="0" alt="Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket"></a>



<a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o94/chrisorbicsebay/kx_500_3.jpg" border="0" alt="Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket"></a>









chrisorbics

  • Guest

chrisorbics

  • Guest