« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: V Force Delta 2 vs 3  (Read 5968 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

emullen

  • Guest
V Force Delta 2 vs 3
« on: December 04, 2006, 10:33:36 AM »
Is there a difference in the Delta 2 vs 3.  Is one better.  Or even a Boyseen Rad valve. I will be doing woods riding.  Plan on getting a gnarly pipe and heavier flywheel.  Have a stock 89 cylinder.

thanks
Logged

Offline Mick

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 123
Re: V Force Delta 2 vs 3
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2006, 05:09:38 PM »
Well the V3 is an improvement over the V2.  But I don't beleive they make it for a 500.  Havn't seen one listed yet.  I have a RAD valve on my KX.  Works great.  But I initially went through three sets of reeds in the first season using it.  I guess Boyesen got tired of me calling so they finally sent me a decent set.  Been using them since.
Logged
1989 KX500
2003 Service Honda CR500AF

liilpa09

  • Guest
Re: V Force Delta 2 vs 3
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2006, 08:57:39 AM »
Which is better? the Boyesen rad valve or the V2?
Logged

Offline Mick

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 123
Re: V Force Delta 2 vs 3
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2006, 02:17:29 PM »
Well I don't have a back to back comparison for a KX.  But I use a VF on my CR.  I couldn't tell a difference in how the both of them worked.  They both felt really good once installed and broadened the power of each.  But my VF has been bullet proof.  Don't have a single negative comment against it.  I'd buy a VF for the Kawi next time myself.  If that tells you anything.
Logged
1989 KX500
2003 Service Honda CR500AF

emullen

  • Guest
Re: V Force Delta 2 vs 3
« Reply #4 on: December 07, 2006, 12:13:21 AM »
ahh well if they don't make V3 then that would answer my question wouldn't it.

Thanks guys - my lack of research -  if I find out otherwise I'll let you know
Logged

Offline kx666

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 352
Re: V Force Delta 2 vs 3
« Reply #5 on: December 07, 2006, 05:58:07 PM »
i have actually spoke to the manufacture on this about 2 years ago. the only reason they even offer the V2 is because they are popular on snowmobiles and the k5 shares simmilar dimms w/ a  snowmobile (i dont remember witch one)
~steve
Logged

Offline doordie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 775
  • Do or Die.....
Re: V Force Delta 2 vs 3
« Reply #6 on: December 10, 2006, 04:23:04 AM »
You can use the KX250 V-force 3.... :wink:

I got one and will try it soon at dyno and report difference to V-force 2. :-D
Logged
Iceroad champion 2006,still 2007,even 2008 without a single race!

Offline kx666

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 352
Re: V Force Delta 2 vs 3
« Reply #7 on: December 11, 2006, 05:20:39 PM »
what are the physical size difference between the v2 for the k5 amd the v 3 for the 250?
~steve
Logged

Offline doordie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 775
  • Do or Die.....
Re: V Force Delta 2 vs 3
« Reply #8 on: December 12, 2006, 04:40:12 AM »
Nothing,only better without any bolts/screw holding reeds only snapp`on! :wink:

Intake some different hole,more round than oval as VF2.

You can use JBweld (plastic)to make a good passing of fuel/air-mix from stock intake- boot to Vforce!
I can show pics of that later.... :wink:
Logged
Iceroad champion 2006,still 2007,even 2008 without a single race!

Offline kx666

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 352
Re: V Force Delta 2 vs 3
« Reply #9 on: December 12, 2006, 02:42:27 PM »
cool! it looks like i am asking for a V3 for x-mas! (or to be more accurate i will order one right after the holidya)  :-D
Logged

Offline kaw rider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,218
  • Cool your engine with water not fuel
Re: V Force Delta 2 vs 3
« Reply #10 on: September 03, 2007, 04:27:23 PM »
the V3 has more volocity. and it narrower. so you could stuff the intake.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »