Author Topic: 92 500 conversion  (Read 17060 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Marco810

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
Re: 92 500 conversion
« Reply #30 on: September 03, 2011, 11:06:54 AM »
The Dep has more of a mid and top pull with over rev, defiantly not as tractor like as the Gnarly. I noticed with this pipe its nearly impossible to ride wide open (any gear) on pavement, the front wheel pops up like nothing, Gnarly seemed a bit more tamed that way. And for the fork conversion holy cow, what a difference, just felt all around more stable at the front


Offline ZETTNORCAL

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 104
Re: 92 500 conversion
« Reply #31 on: September 03, 2011, 12:36:41 PM »
That DEP is for a CR500 right?

Offline Marco810

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
Re: 92 500 conversion
« Reply #32 on: September 03, 2011, 02:49:43 PM »
Correct. Didnt think they made kx5 pipes?

Offline quickrip

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 21
  • carnegieforever.com
Re: 92 500 conversion
« Reply #33 on: September 05, 2011, 03:41:57 PM »
how does the dep compare to the stock pipe. I feel like the gnarly (im assuming youre referring to woods pipe) has nothing up top at all. Ive heard that the dep has a very broad power band and pulls hard all over. Do you feel this is accurate?
93 kx5          08 yz250
93 kdx200     72 honda qa50
71 trail 50      96 pw50
85 xl250

Offline Marco810

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
Re: 92 500 conversion
« Reply #34 on: March 16, 2012, 08:30:45 AM »
how does the dep compare to the stock pipe. I feel like the gnarly (im assuming youre referring to woods pipe) has nothing up top at all. Ive heard that the dep has a very broad power band and pulls hard all over. Do you feel this is accurate?

Sorry extremely delayed reply *was hibernating over winter*. Yeah i can agree with it having a smooth power output all over the rpm range


starting digging into the engine for the first time and so fare ive concluded i need a replate job and crank rebuild for sure. debating having it ported as well but cant make up my mind :?. Any suggestions and what should be looked over when rebuilding the k5 eninge, open to mod suggestions too






Offline Marco810

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
Re: 92 500 conversion
« Reply #35 on: April 29, 2012, 10:01:23 AM »
Been playing around with JB weld :-D











Also got a Trail Tech gauge

Offline Marco810

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
Re: 92 500 conversion
« Reply #36 on: May 02, 2012, 02:06:50 PM »
Going to run a 01 kx250 ignition. from what ive read it will make it more snappy.. if its too extreme ill buy a hpi programmable ignition and or flywheel weight



Offline Marco810

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
Re: 92 500 conversion
« Reply #37 on: May 04, 2012, 03:04:34 PM »
Hmm two kinds of main seals to choose from. Both from MooseRacing

ones to left came with main bearings as a kit, and to the right was a complete engine seal kit. Should i just toss a coin?


Offline Marco810

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
Re: 92 500 conversion
« Reply #38 on: May 06, 2012, 01:37:41 PM »
Something to look at




Offline Marco810

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
Re: 92 500 conversion
« Reply #39 on: May 07, 2012, 02:04:54 PM »
Got my cylinder back