I'm confused about the reasoning, also. Some people out there are thinking its the noise, but the 4-strokes are a higher decible with a lower tone. Thier sound carries alot further. Others think emissions, but like you guys are saying... what percent of our pollution is directly related to recreational vehicles? Some might reason that the MPG's of a 4-stroke make it a more effecient for our fuel shortage. Then why are hybrid cars not allowed in the US if they are too effecient? Thats right, if a electric or hybrid car is above something like 35 mpg's, its not allowed to be sold in the US. I've also heard that it is a demand thing. Hows that? Only the wealthy can afford to buy a new 4-stroke, maintain and modify it. I think it comes down to the almighty dollar from our Manufacturers. Bikes, Parts, upgrades, maintenance, absolutely all of it is more money for a 4-stroke. Oh yeah, and the conservitive jokers from California, who are down on anything fun are masters at shifting the blame and appearing to be taking some serious action while doing absolutely nothing to the root of the problems. Anyone can be a critic. And anyone with enough money can broadcast thier critisisms, but it takes a genious to make real effective changes. Too bad we are short on those.
In states like Kentucky, West Virginia, Tennessee, Illinois, Michigan, some in Indiana, and I'm sure plenty of other states, they have state organized ORV trails. Rules are simple stay on the marked trails and no trailblazing. This is their fix to random destruction of national forest property. Why doesn't that mentality work everywhere? Designate places to ride and give struggling communities some tourism, and they can even charge for weekend or yearly permits to stimulate local government cash flow.
Everyone, who is concerned about this trend, needs to become an AMA member and push for your right to ride.