So I know I'm sounding like a broken record here (what is the modern phrase for that?) so I'll bring this up one more time and shut up about it. You really need to take a second look at 7075 on the frame. I've had field failures with product using 7075 because of the smallest surface scratches from machining which promoted SCC. This has nothing to do with welding, machined parts in 7075 can fail under pretty benign conditions. 7075 needs to be in the T7 temper for this application but you might very well anneal the rest of the frame too much by doing so. You need to look at the aging curves of all the alloys involved and see if a compatible process exists. If you don't you could end up in the hospitol or under ground.
Maybe it's a good idea to install one extra head mount, on the front of the engine. Just in case. Then always investigate the suspicious parts on cracks after riding the KX5.
I have done some research. Know your point know. But besides, the alloy is often used in the aircraft industrie, and there are also welded mountainbike (or other bicycle) frames made of this alloy. 7075 has good properties of tensile strenght and dynamic tensions. But if I understand you the right way, there is a chance the combined alloys can provide stress in the material, which can lead to cracks (stress corrosion cracking).
If I make an extra head mount, the suspicious parts can fail by cracking, but the chassis will stay together. Or al the four points (now it has three points) of mounts has to fail at the same time.
When i have some time, I wil make an extra Y part, made of another alloy. So when it's neccessary I can replace the Y part easily, it will take me a few hours to re-weld the frame when the engine and the other parts are removed.
Very interesting case... I'm curious about how the frame will stand under charging the KX5.